Documentation / QueryTek Review glossary / Review Module

Review module

In Short

A review module is a packaged category of document review: a defined kind of material, the questions reviewers ask of it, and the rubric that turns those questions into consistent findings. Choosing a module fixes what "good" means for a submission before any reviewer reads a word.

Review Module concept diagram

Definition

Review services that accept "any document, any concern" drift quickly. One reviewer checks tone, another checks accuracy, and the customer receives findings that cannot be compared. A module prevents that drift by bundling three things that belong together.

Material type. A module states what it is for — AI-generated answers, policy and handbook text, courseware, regulated prose written for the public. Material outside that type can still be reviewed, but under the module that fits it.

Evaluation lens. Each module carries its own emphasis. An AI output review weighs verifiability and completeness; a plain language review weighs whether a reader can find and act on what they need. The lens is what makes two reviewers read the same document the same way.

Rubric. The lens is expressed as rubric dimensions and levels, so findings are recorded against named criteria rather than as free-form opinion. The customer's standards profile then adjusts that rubric to its own house rules.

The distinction readers most often miss is between a module and a service tier. A module answers what kind of review; turnaround and delivery channel are separate choices layered on top.

Why It Matters

Picking the wrong module produces confident findings about the wrong questions. A training course sent for content risk review may come back clean on sensitivity while its instructional gaps go unexamined. Naming the module up front also makes price and scope predictable, because both follow from the category rather than from negotiation per document.

How QueryTek Uses It

QueryTek Review sells four modules: AI Output, Content Risk, Learning Content, and Plain Language. The customer selects a module for each submission, and that choice sets the rubric reviewers apply and the per-word rate used in the quote. Module rubrics are refined by the customer's standards profile; the rubric contents themselves are shared with customers rather than published.

Related Terms